week 5 assessment research

Unit 5 Assessment Research

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 65
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Instructions

Employ: Research Process

Evaluation Title: Research

This course requires the completion of a major research paper (8 to 10 content pages, not including the title, abstract and reference page) for the final assignment. In order to do this, the writing must be in a style appropriate for an academic discourse community and the references should be academic references. At least five of the articles must be located in the Herzing University Library

This week’s assignment builds on the unit 4 assessment and completes the gathering of reference materials.

  • Begin with the introduction to the paper which should include the thesis statement.
  • Submit a minimum of 7 primary resources and 3 secondary resources, for one of the following topics (In Unit 4, 3 primary and 2 secondary resources were submitted-please highlight these resources in the new document)
    • 3D Printing
    • High-speed rail
    • Stem Cell Research
    • Crowdfunding
  • Complete the literature review for each of the resources identified
  • Include the APA reference page

The literary resources and introduction should be in APA format.

All citations and references should be in APA format.

Estimated time to complete: 6 hours

Rubric

Unit 5 Assessment Research

Unit 5 Assessment Research

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentEN304-CO3

20.0 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

20.0 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

10.0 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

9.0 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

6.0 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10.0 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

6.0 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

2.0 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

1.0 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

4.0 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

3.5 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

3.0 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

2.0 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

0.0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 65.0

<a href="https://herzing.instructure.com/courses/7123/modules/items/410778" role="button" class="Button module-sequence-footer-button–previous" data-tooltip="right" data-html-tooltip-title=" Unit 5 Discussion – Resources” aria-describedby=”msf1-previous-desc”>PreviousNext

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


The post week 5 assessment research appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.

blank