1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% | 2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00% | 3
Satisfactory
79.00% | 4
Good
87.00% | 5
Excellent
100.00% |
| 100.0 %Content | |
| 35.0 %Part 1: Create a Transcript of the Session | The transcript does not identify a specific presenting concern of the family member from the session using solution-focused language and does not identify a solution to the problem. | The transcript vaguely identifies a specific presenting concern of the family member from the session using solution-focused language and vaguely identifies a solution to the problem. | The transcript fully identifies a specific presenting concern of the family member from the session using solution-focused language and fully identifies a solution to the problem. | The transcript provides an advanced identification of a specific presenting concern of the family member from the session using solution-focused language and fully identifies a solution to the problem. | The transcript provides a comprehensive identification of a specific presenting concern of the family member from the session using solution-focused language and thoroughly identifies a solution to the problem. |
| 35.0 %Part 2: Write a Mid-Treatment Letter to the Identified Family Member | The mid-treatment letter does not identify one member of the family whose dominant story could use some rewriting. | The mid-treatment letter vaguely identifies one member of the family whose dominant story could use some rewriting. | The mid-treatment letter fully identifies one member of the family whose dominant story could use some rewriting. | The mid-treatment letter provides an advanced identification of one member of the family whose dominant story could use some rewriting. | The mid-treatment letter provides a comprehensive identification of one member of the family whose dominant story could use some rewriting. |
| 8.0 %Technical Skill | Execution does not meet the criteria outlined. | Execution is sloppy and unprofessional. | Execution needs improvement. | Execution is of good quality. | Execution is flawless. Demonstrates an in-depth, high-level of understanding. |
| 8.0 %Presentation | The pieces are not neat or organized, and does not include all required elements. | The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | The work is well-presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. |
| 4.0 %Research | No outside sources were used to support the assignment. | Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. | Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness. | Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English. |
| 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| 100 %Total Weightage | |
